I can’t believe the rush of pundits to nail Kieren Shoemark
to the cross for his ride on Field of Gold in the 2,000 Guineas.
First of all am I speaking through my pocket? Not really. I
had a good bet on FoG to win the Craven and saved on the colt having backed
Shadow of Light ante post for the colts classic.
When I am at the races I like to watch the horses canter to
start to see how they use themselves before the race.
At Newmarket watching horses go to post is like watching the
race actions in reverse. From the winning post they go downhill as the proceed
to the start. They then meet the rising ground i.e. the ‘Dip’ in reverse.
Before the Craven FoG was rather short when on the course
going to post. Only when he hit the rising ground did he change his legs and lengthen
in a pleasing manner. I knew then he would extend and quicken in style in the final
furlong.
The same before the Guineas and the same scenario played out
in the contest. Ruling Court quickened superbly into the dip but FoG did not
fully stride out and could not go the pace. Once again, only when he hit the
rising ground did he begin to catch up.
Just because Buick went for home sooner is irrelevant.
Shoemark correctly waited on the horse with the known turn of foot but he
lacked the wherewithal going downhill.
Shoemark took one for the team by saying he was at fault. He
was wrong. The horse did not have the speed when needed.
Should the Gosdens have trained the horse to handle the
gradients better?
Maybe that is the more pertinent question to ask in the post
mortems.